Author logo Researching dialect

Introduction
What is research?
The research process
Working from a hypothesis
Working without a hypothesis
The quantitative-qualitative debate
Case studies
Which approach?
Ideas for dialect research
Data collection
Sampling a population
Reporting the research
Dialect research and information technology
Maximize this page

Introduction

This guide is written for students who are following GCE Advanced level (AS and A2) syllabuses in English Language. This resource may also be of general interest to language students on university degree courses, trainee teachers and anyone with a general interest in language science.

Please look at the contents page for a full list of specific guides on this site.

Back to top

I have adapted this guide from a schools' pack prepared by the Yorkshire Dialect Society. I am especially grateful to Dr. Barrie Rhodes (who wrote the original guide that I have adapted here), to Jeremy Muldowney and to Brian Spencer for their help, and to the Society for permission to use this material.

This is not a comprehensive guide to academic research. But it should be helpful to those who are to undertake, or guide, small-scale dialect and language variation projects, as part of their linguistic studies. The experience gained in pursuing small-scale research at senior school level should serve as a useful preparation for later work at college or university level.

You may wish to look also at my guide to language investigations. Click on the link below to open the guide:

Back to top

What is research?

There is nothing complicated about the concept of "research". It is simply "finding out". We conduct simple research often in our daily lives:

  • looking up bus times on a timetable,
  • comparing prices of goods in different supermarkets,
  • determining which car to buy to suit our pocket and purpose, or
  • trying on clothes to see which we look best in.

These are all examples of simple research.

The main difference between conducting this simple, everyday research and carrying out "academic" research is that, in the main, we are conducting the process for different audiences. Looking up bus times and comparing the prices of goods is likely to be done primarily for oneself. On the other hand, "academic" research (though it may serve to satisfy one's own curiosity) is generally for a wider, more critical audience. This being so, we will find it necessary to be more careful about how we plan, conduct, and report on, the research. We may express our concern for care over these things by the term "rigour" - we aim to be rigorous in our research.

Back to top

If we want to be rigorous in our research, then we should:

  • define a clearly stated purpose and a focus appropriate to this;
  • plan in detail, taking into account every factor which may affect the data collection and the processing of the findings;
  • strive to be objective, eliminating as far as possible any bias, prejudice or predetermination on the part of the researcher;
  • scrutinize and analyse the collected data carefully, searching for patterns and trends, and indentifying further questions and ideas;
  • report our findings clearly, in appropriate language;
  • be professionally self-critical, and acknowledge the limitations and weaknesses of the research project;.
  • research in ways that other investigators can replicate (repeat) should they wish to test out the researchers' theories and findings for themselves.

Back to top

The research process

Research rarely claims to "prove" anything. All it is honestly able to do is to offer evidence that at a particular time, in a particular context and under such and such particular circumstances, this is the picture that seems to have emerged. It is provisional and tentative, in the sense that its findings stand only until someone else comes along and produces different findings from similar research. The process can be envisaged as a cycle, for it is often found that a research project gives rise to more questions than it answers - and these questions point out the direction in which subsequent research can go.

Determining a research purpose. The why? stage
Identification of a focus, hypothesis or guiding question(s). The what? stage
Research design. May include: choosing a sampling device; demarcating a geographical area; deciding on a methodology; framing suitable questions to pose; planning for data collection in such a way that it will lend itself to clear presentation and subsequent analysis and interpretation; deciding on a presentation format. The how? stage.
The collection of data stage.
Analysis and interpretation of the data. The search for patterns and trends; tentative and qualified explanations for these The what do the data seem to say? stage.
Reporting the research. The report is usually in written form, supported by graphic material, tables, etc. but in some cases alternative formats can be appropriate and used to good effect (audio taping, videos, for example). A report usually follows a fairly standard format (see below). The this is what we have to tell you stage.
The where do we go next? question. One's own research project may end at the reporting stage with further research becoming someone else's concern.
Further Research. The selection of one or more questions or findings emerging from the research, as lines of further investigation. If it is appropriate, then there may be further research, leading back to determining a research purpose...

Back to top

Working from a hypothesis

Many researchers elect to use a methodology that starts with a hypothesis. This is a carefully constructed, unequivocal statement which will guide and focus the research through all its stages.

"Dialect words are to be found in use only in the over-60 age range in this locality" might be a suitable hypothesis in the context of this guide. All the research - its objectives, its methodology, its conduct, its analysis and its reporting - will then be kept on track in trying to find out whether or not this hypothesis seems to be substantiated.

Note that we have not said "...prove that it is true". If we were driven largely by the need to "prove" something, then we might be in danger of letting personal bias and prejudice intrude, unconsciously or consciously skewing our research to achieve this end. The truly rigorous researcher has to be able to detach himself or herself from such motivations, to remain impartial and "distant", and to accept that a hypothesis which is not upheld by the results is just as valuable as one that is. It is the search for apparent truth that is important; revealing it, even though it might not be what one expected or hoped for, is what matters most.

Back to top

Working without a hypothesis

Research does not always have to follow a stated hypothesis. Some types of research are "open-ended", designed simply to see what they throw up, or to provide a framework, or isolate more specific issues for further research. Such procedures are often used to provide the foundation for tighter-focused, hypothesis-based projects. Some simply serve a purpose in themselves. Sometimes, a "guiding question" might be used instead of a baldly stated hypothesis: "Is there evidence of the preservation of traditional dialect in the XYZ area?"

Back to top

The quantitative-qualitative debate

Quantitative research | Qualitative research

Social science research methods can fall anywhere on a continuum between a quantitative pole and a qualitative pole.

Quantitative research ←—————→ Qualitative research

Back to top

Quantitative research

Quantitative research is characterised by the collection of data and its processing in an objective, mathematical, close-ended way. It is often claimed to be more rigorous and scientific than research carried out nearer the qualitative end of the continuum. Data and findings are likely to be presented in numerical, tabular or graphic form; statistical processing is frequently used.

Quantitative researchers claim to be able to be objective and "distanced" from the process and findings of the research, letting "… the numbers do the work and carry the message". A quantitative research project should allow other researchers to replicate it or use it in a comparative way.

Back to top

Quantitative research generally

  • employs larger samples,
  • has less direct researcher involvement and
  • results in data which are not always easy to analyse and interpret.

But

  • the researcher retains closer control,
  • the results can be generalised to a wider population and
  • the work can be replicated by others.

This kind of research is sometimes referred to as being of a positivist orientation or working within a positivist paradigm.

Back to top

Qualitative research

By contrast, qualitative research is more open-ended. It relies more on interpretation than on the apparent objectivity conveyed by the quantitative methods. Qualitative research can be said to have an interpretative orientation or being worked within an interpretative paradigm. The qualitative researcher seeks to get inside the matter under investigation, to dig beneath the superficial characteristics which the quantitative methods tend to measure, and to reveal the "truth", not as an objective reality, but as it is experienced and perceived by the informants.

A great deal depends on the researchers' skill and ability to counter criticisms of subjectivity, selectivity, and the intrusion of personal bias or prejudice. By its very nature, qualitative research cannot be replicated, generalised or used in a comparative way.

Back to top

Typically, qualitative research

  • involves fewer informants,
  • leads to results that cannot be generalized (as they apply to few subjects or just one), and
  • cannot really be replicated, as it depends on the researcher's own interpretations.

Back to top

Picture of a hammer

A simple analogy will serve to illustrate some of the different characteristics of the two poles. Let us take an old claw hammer which two people have been requested to investigate and report on. A person using a quantitative approach might report:

This object is a percussive tool, consisting of three parts: a metal head, a wooden handle and a metal wedge, which secures the head to the handle. It measures 35 centimetres in overall length and weighs 1.5 kilograms. The handle is made of ash, oval in section. For approximately two-fifths of its length from the head the handle is waisted. The head is of forged steel and is double ended One end is a striking end with a face which has been case-hardened. The other end of the head is a curved, two-pronged claw, which can be used for extracting nails by leverage.

Back to top

The person with qualitative inclinations, on the other hand, might describe the same hammer in this way:

This hammer is a beautifully balanced object. It "falls to hand" comfortably, as a craftsman would say. The slender-waisted ash handle is well polished by years of contact with many different workers' hands. Provided that the handle is gripped correctly, close to the end, it swings in a satisfying way and the striking face makes clean and efficient contact with the object (most often a nail) being struck The claw end of the head is used for extracting nails or for prising apart two layers of timber, for example. It is clear that this particular tool has been well cared for over many years.

Both accounts tell us interesting and valuable things about the hammer - but the information is quite different in each case. The two accounts would serve quite different purposes.

Back to top

Case studies

Case studies are a particular form of research within the qualitative orientation. Case studies aim to portray a specific instance. The researcher using a case study approach attempts to penetrate beneath the superficial surface features of situations in such a way that the complexities, multiple interactions and relationships are revealed, which might otherwise remain unexposed by the "scientific" collection of quantitative, statistical data.

Not all social research has to be either/or. A piece of research can be located anywhere on the quantitative-qualitative continuum. In practice, however, it is usual for a project to be located close to or at one pole or the other.

Back to top

Plenty of researchers choose to approach their task by applying two quite distinct methods on the same phenomenon. This is a process called triangulation. The name comes from the navigational technique of taking sightings (compass backbearings) on three distant objects, which give a more accurate plotting of one's true position than two sightings. As its name suggests, this technique should really involve three different approaches but, in the social science context, the use of more than one is classed as triangulation. It is claimed that a truer picture is likely to emerge if two or more investigative processes are used on the same phenomenon. Researchers, therefore, sometimes approach their investigation by a quantitative investigation and complement this with a qualitative investigation.

The results can be quite powerful, for while the quantitative method reveals the "what", the qualitative complement throws light on the "why".

Back to top

Which approach?

By now, you may be asking "So, which method should I use in my own small-scale dialect research project? ". Our recommendation would be to employ a quantitative approach as a first venture into small-scale research. It is likely to be clearer, simpler to operate and more efficient in time and labour. The objectivity intrinsic in the numerical treatment of data helps prevent personal bias from creeping in.

Qualitative researchers need a great deal of skill and experience to be able to construct their investigations in such a way that outcomes are not simply self-fulfilling prophesies. They need to be able to counter arguments that personal bias or prejudice has intruded.

Back to top

But students will probably have met case studies in other subjects, say, geography, sociology or psychology. They may feel familiar enough with such studies to be able to competently employ one in dialect research. The findings of a case study are local, specific and not generalisable to other samples and contexts. The case study to some extent stands on its own; to borrow a phrase from the world of computing, “what you see is what you get” - and one cannot readily "export" it elsewhere.

Yet a case study has the potential to reveal much that is valuable and informative and which can be "lost" or remain "hidden" by the use of a more objective, quantitative approach. If a would-be researcher is inclined towards a case study, he or she should consult more detailed sources of guidance on the methodology.

Back to top

Ideas for small-scale dialect research

Simple surveys | More sophisticated surveys

Here are some suggestions for ways in which you may research dialect.

Simple Surveys

Most dialect research, because of its very nature, will involve conducting a survey of some kind. Suitable survey-type research topics might include:

  1. Knowledge of dialect: construct a list of dialect words. Ask informants to identify words of which they know the meanings (you can ask them to choose from a list of definitions or descriptions)
  2. Words heard but not known: you could ask informants about words that they have heard but of which they do not know the meanings.
  3. Use of dialect: construct a list of dialect words. Ask informants to say which words they still use in everyday speech.
  4. Knowledge and use: combine a and c in one survey, asking informants to say not only what they know but also which of these they still use.
  5. Multi-dimensional: with careful planning of the interview or questionnaire, you can combine a, b and c.

Back to top

More sophisticated surveys

Surveys of lexical alternatives | Variation by age or sex | A comparative study

Surveys of lexical alternatives

Survey a randomly-selected sample of people, asking them what alternatives word(s) they know for some given Standard English lexical items. For example:

  • a spider (or insect, such as a bee)
  • a hedgehog
  • sweets (confectionery)
  • a barn (i.e. agricultural building)
  • a cowshed
  • the action of making a drink of tea
  • playing (playing out, playing football and so on)
  • items of clothing or footwear (trousers, underpants, shoes worn for physical education)

...and so on.

Back to top

To avoid suggesting the answer you may, instead of Standard English nouns, use a picture or short description to represent the subject.

Such a list should preferably not contain more than, say, thirty words or expressions and these should be selected as being regionally relevant (that is, based on the recognised dialect vocabulary of one of the three historic Ridings of Yorkshire or of another defined locality).

Back to top

Variation by age or sex

In your research you might group subjects by sex or age. Here are some possible groupings:

  • Men/women over 60 years of age
  • Men/women between 40 and 59 years of age
  • Men/women between 20 and 39 years of age
  • Men/women under 20 years of age

At an even greater level of sophistication and complexity might be a project which attempts to measure how knowledge and use of dialect has changed over time. This could be done by collecting data from informants across a stratified age range.

Back to top

Such a survey could be conducted by face-to-face interview or on a prepared, self completion questionnaire. A variety of mathematical processes could be applied to the data to provide comparative, quantitative results. Between 30 and 50 words should give some useful and interesting data. This could give a picture of change in the levels of knowledge and use over the generations. A qualitative element could perhaps be introduced by asking informants to explain why they had abandoned words they habitually used in the past.

Of quite a different nature would be the analysis of the use of dialect in a work of literature. Several famous authors (Sir Walter Scott, Alfred Tennyson, Charles Dickens, the Brontės, Thomas Hardy, D.H. Lawrence) frequently had their characters speaking in appropriate local speech styles. The results could, for example, be compared with levels of knowledge and use in the present day.

Back to top

A comparative study

Another possibility might be a comparative study. The starting point here is someone else's research project. By replicating the research, but changing just one variable, you can compare one piece of research with another. For example, you can copy all the methodology and data collection processes of the original piece of research - but for a different population. The intention here would be to see how one population (represented by a sample) compares with another. If you keep all the other variables constant, you may claim that any differences are due to the characteristics of the two populations. The simpler the original piece of research, the easier it is to make a comparative study.

This may be particularly suitable for students on advanced courses in schools or degree courses at universities - to take studies generally regarded as canonical or authoritative, and seeing whether the findings hold good for a different population (in terms of place or time). So Peter Trudgill's research in Norwich could be repeated with a different sample of respondents, say.

Back to top

Data collection - methods of collecting and recording data

Interviews | Questionnaires | Audio and video recordings

Interviews

These are face-to-face interviews, with the researcher completing the documentation. The documentation may be a prepared questionnaire which poses close-ended, objective questions; or it may take the form of a list of fairly open-ended question headings to which the informant can respond in an individual way. It is a good idea to practice and rehearse interviews on a small sample of people who will not be involved in the data collection proper.

Back to top

Questionnaires

You can design these so that they are for the informants' self-completion, in their own time. Alternatively, they can form the basis for an interview with the researcher posing the questions and completing the form with the respondents' answers.

Questionnaires need careful thought and design. The researcher should consider a number of important points:

  • Be clear just what information you are seeking and design your questions to serve this purpose.
  • Design your questions in such a way that they will produce information that will lend itself to analysis and interpretation. The process is rather like that often attributed to computers: "Garbage in, garbage out". Try to ensure that what you get back is not garbage or you will not be able to usefully analyse and interpret it.

Back to top

Here are some practical suggestions:

  • Limit the number of questions. Few people have the time or inclination to complete long, rambling questionnaires. Decide on the minimum number of questions you need to pose to obtain the information you are seeking.
  • Work out your system for distributing and recovering questionnaires.
  • Make the questions short, clear and unambiguous. Respondents give up if they have to read a question two or three times to make sense of it or if it can be interpreted in more than one way. You may consider designing your questionnaire so that its completion involves merely putting ticks in boxes or circling chosen words, for example.
  • Try out your questionnaire, in a "pilot study", on a small group of people who will not be involved in the research proper. Go through the process of sorting the data from these, analysing them and seeing if they lend themselves to useful interpretation.
  • Modify your questionnaire, if necessary, and go through the piloting process again, until you are satisfied with it.

Back to top

You may use your questionnaire to collect information other than the raw data of the questions themselves: the age, sex, place of birth and childhood, length of residence in the area, and so on. Use this opportunity to gather this kind of background social information but do not try to make the questionnaire form do too much, or the information you get back will become unwieldy and you will have trouble sorting the wheat from the chaff.

Back to top

Audio and video recordings

As a researcher you can make audio or video recordings of, say, people who habitually use "traditional dialect" words in their everyday speech. A good approach is to ask the informant to perhaps recount a memorable childhood experience, a "near miss" accident, anecdotes of working life, an account of social conditions as a young person, and so on. Simply asking a person what dialect words they know is likely to be unproductive. Replay the recording to the informant and ask him/her to explain the meanings of any words you are unfamiliar with. Take account of research ethics: always obtain the informants' permission before making any recording. If, after hearing the playback, an informant objects to anything in the recording, then it should be amended or erased.

The data you obtain from this technique will, by their very nature, be very "open ended" and the you will find that they are not easy to analyse in such a way that you can easily organise them. It may take many reviews before you can see any patterns or trends emerging.

If you use digital technologies, then you can easily share the data files from your recordings with other computer users.

Back to top

Sampling a population

Some generalities about sampling | The nature of the sample and the issue of randomness | Sources of samples

Some generalities about sampling

It is clearly impossible to interview or have questionnaires completed by an entire population (unless a very small settlement or area involved). The researchers' way around this is to draw on a representative sample of that population and generalise the results to the entire population. How large or small a sample needs to be depends on several factors:

  • the total size of the population being studied;
  • how accessible informants are;
  • how much power is available to the researcher to collect data;
  • how much time the researcher has at his or her disposal;
  • the objectives and focus of the research.

Back to top

Some researchers talk of "drawing a sample frame", appropriate to the needs of the research project. The "frame" includes consideration of not only the size of the sample but also the characteristics of the informants: age, sex, social class, area of residence, length of residence, etc. and this should be in balance with the make-up of the population from which the sample is to be drawn.

In general, the larger a sample as a percentage of a population, the truer the data are likely to be. But for school purposes, samples of between 30 and 50 informants will, in most cases, be adequate. Less than 30 and the collected data are unlikely to give anything approaching an accurate picture of the situation. More than 50 and the data become less manageable in terms of processing, analysis and interpretation.

Obviously, different considerations apply if the researcher is making a case study.

Back to top

The nature of the sample and the issue of randomness

Stratified random sample | Selective or purposive sample | Opportunity sample | Stratification by stages

The type of sample used depends fundamentally on the purpose of the research.

For much research it is deemed desirable, and academically rigorous, to have a genuine random sample of informants, to provide objective and representative data. This type of sample would be needed if, say, the research purpose was to gain a picture of what levels of dialect knowledge and/or use presently exist in a defined area.

Stratified random sample

For some research purposes, a representative cross-section of the population might be needed, to include an appropriate balance (stratification) of age, sex, long-term residents, recent incomers, ethnic minorities, a spread of social classes, and so on, for these and other factors affect the cultural transmission and conservation of "traditional dialect". Within the defined strata, selection is randomised. Stratification inevitably means some loss of genuine randomness but it can be argued that it is likely to be more representative of a population.

Back to top

Selective or purposive sample

By contrast, if the purpose is to collect and record a comprehensive corpus of dialect words and expressions, it might be necessary to identify and recruit as informants only those people who are believed to be known users of such words. This would be selective or purposive sampling. It is obviously not random and the researcher has to guard against accusations of distorted personal bias in the selection of informants simply to "...prove a point".

Back to top

Opportunity sample

In some instances, an opportunity sample might be appropriate. This might take the form, for example, of approaching every nth person encountered in the street and interviewing them. Unlike purposive sampling, this has a degree of randomness about it but is not regarded as being as rigorous as genuinely random sampling.

Back to top

Sources of samples

Telephone directories | Electoral registers | “On the knocker ” | From the map | Post codes

Except for opportunity sampling, it is necessary to have some way of making a selection to suit the sample "frame". There are several ways in which this can be done; some ways are more appropriate to the objectives of the research and to the sample "frame" parameters than others. All have drawbacks.

Telephone directories

It is possible to select a random sample from telephone directories by, say, picking the first, tenth, fortieth or whatever, entry on each page. There are two major problems. It would not include anyone without a telephone. It does not lend itself to any form of stratification.

Electoral registers

Again, stratification is not possible. It does not include those below voting age.

Back to top

"On the knocker"

This usually takes the form of selecting, say, every tenth house in a street. Age and sex stratification is not always possible. Some crude social stratification is possible if a balanced number of houses is selected in different areas (a council estate, a middle-class estate of owner-occupied houses, an area of predominantly student accommodation, a rural village, an inner city area, and so forth).

Back to top

From the map

Use a large-scale Ordnance Survey map and demarcate the boundaries of the research's geographical area. Use some kind of random device to select a precise grid reference within the area. It is possible to obtain computer programs which generate random numbers and, if these are of six or eight figures within the range of possible grid references for the chosen area, individual houses (or at least clusters of houses) can be selected. If the result is a cluster, then the researcher can determine that only one, randomly-chosen house within it shall be used. Failing all other means, a blindfold and a pin can be utilised! Obviously, this method of selecting a sample cannot employ stratification.

Back to top

Post codes

Post codes can be used in a similar way to grid references. Again, a choice of house within a post code would be necessary and stratification is not possible.

Stratification by stages

It is possible to use a combination of selection devices to progressively arrive at a stratifiled sample, if one is needed. For instance, the map method can be used to randomly select small groups or clusters of houses. A physical visit to each cluster might then enable the researcher to identify informants who fit the stratification criteria - a woman over 65 years of age, a male under 20 years of age, and so on.

Back to top

Reporting the research - the content of a research report

The background and rationale | The contexts | The literature review | The methodology to be used | Presentation of the collected data | Analysis of the data | Interpretation of the data | The conclusion | Bibliography | Appendices

Written research reports tend to follow a certain pattern. Normally this is divided into sections, or chapters, as follows:

The background and rationale

What prompted the research? Why is it being done? What hypotheses, focuses or guiding question(s) will be used?

The contexts

Where, geographically speaking, is the research being done? What other contexts are relevant - historical, social, demographic, others?

Back to top

The literature review

In this section or chapter the writer reviews the main substance of existing literature which has a bearing on the present research. The intention is to show the audience that the researcher has done his or her homework before embarking on the project. Often, some theory or earlier research reported in the literature is what provides the incentive and motivation to carry out one's own research. Readers find themselves asking questions such as:

"Would this really apply in my locality? "

or

"If this issue had to be researched in a different way, would it produce similar or different results? "

Back to top

The methodology to be used

Describes how the research is to be conducted. This is normally written in the future or present tenses, as a statement of intent and as though the research has yet to be carried out:

"Informants will be asked to complete a questionnaire...."

Back to top

Presentation of the collected data

This can be textual, numerical, tabular, graphic or a combination of these. This is normally presented in the past tense, with the research already carried out:

"Only seven people responded to this question".
Analysis of the data

This is a straightforward account of what the data say.

"It will be seen that 20 people had heard this word. Of these, 16 were able to define its meaning. On the other hand, word X had been heard by only 6 people, though 5 of these were able to attribute meaning to it".

The main purpose of the analysis is to identify patterns and trends within the data.

Back to top

Interpretation of the data

In this section or chapter the writer considers the patterns and trends which emerged from the analysis and attempts to account for these. It is important that the writer remains cautious, tentative and circumspect here:

"It appears from the data that there has been a rapid decline in dialect usage in this community. However, dialect knowledge does not seem to have declined as dramatically".

In interpreting data, the researcher should frequently use words and phrases such as: "...it seems that...“, ”... perhaps.. ", it may be... in these particular circumstances...", in the context of this research..." and other qualifiers.

Back to top

The conclusion

This sums up the research as a whole. It is important to try to avoid repetition of what has already been presented, if at all possible, though certain important issues may be re-examined in closer detail if necessary. This section or chapter can also contain suggestions for further lines of research which might usefully follow. A critique should be included, where the writer acknowledges any limitations and weakness which he or she has identified in the planning and conduct of the research.

Bibliography

This is a list of the books, articles and other sources the researcher has consulted and used to support the research. There are several alternative ways in which such a list can be constructed. The more usual, recognised formats can be found in British Standards Institute publications. One of the more usual formats is:

Author's surname. Author's initials. Year of publication (in brackets). Title. Place of publication. Publisher.

For example:

Beckham, D. (1999) The Failure of the Word; London: Sexton Publications.

Articles from periodic journals normally appear like this:

Blyton, E. (1998) Teach them to speak properly. Journal of Modern Speech, pp. 108-119.

Articles from collected works in a one-off publication follow this format:

Featherstonehaugh, A. and Cholmondeley, Z. "Drawing the boundaries in dialect" in Blair, A. and Brown, G. (Editors) (1987) Dialect Studies in the 20th Century (2nd Edition); New York. Fortune Inc.

Back to top

Appendices

Appendices (normally titled Appendix A, Appendix B, and so on) are a part of the report used to store and present supporting data, which would otherwise take up too much space, (and detract from readability) in the main body of the report. Appendices often take the form of tables, charts, lengthy extracts and subsidiary material. They should always be referred to in the main body:

"Appendix D shows... "; "As can be seen from the figures in Appendix B.... "

If an appendix is not referred to somewhere in the main body it is questionable whether it should be included, as there is a danger that appendices can simply become repositories for all sorts of irrelevant material, in a misguided attempt to give the report some physical bulk.

Would-be researchers at school level are advised to read a variety of works by recognised authorities, to gain a feeling for the tenor and register which academic researchers use in their reports. Such works will also provide useful examples of how to use direct and indirect quotation, citations, references and the other conventions of research reporting.

Back to top

Dialect research and information technology

Researchers could:

  • Use a wordprocessor application to record and store lists of words.
  • Use a spreadsheet application to record counts and frequencies. The researchers may then process these and display them as bar charts, pie charts, line graphs or other graphic forms.
  • Construct a database which can act as a continually-growing repository for dialect words the students collect. The "fields" of data might be:
    • The dialect word or expression.
    • The meaning.
    • Any alternative meaning(s).
    • The source (in literature, from an informant, etc).
    • Where an informant is the source, the informant's:
      • Age
      • Sex
      • Present place of residence
      • Length of residence in the locality
      • Place of birth
      • Place of upbringing (up to, say, 16 years of age)
    • The date the information was recorded.
    • The name and status of the researcher making the record.
  • Build a Web site (a collection of linked hypertext documents) to display and share a project and its findings.

Back to top


DfEE Standards Site
BBC Education
BBC Education's Bookcase site
BBC revision site
Public Broadcasting Service
Public Broadcasting Service Arts site
European Virtual School
Virtual Library
AcademicInfo
LearnCo
Homework High
Google
Excite
Altavista
Yahoo
MSN
Lycos
Metacrawler
AOL
HotBot
iWon
Netscape
Ask Jeeves
About
Monstercrawler
Looksmart
Dogpile
Raging Search
All the web
Go
GoTo
Go2Net


© Barrie Rhodes and the Yorkshire Dialect Society, 2003-2004; Contact me.

Search Now:
In Association with Amazon.com
  • Use the search box on the left or the link below to go to Amazon.com for books, video tapes, DVDs and much more.
  • Go to Amazon.com Home Page
Search Now:
In Association with Amazon.co.uk
  • Purchase in the UK: use the search box on the left or the link below to go to Amazon.co.uk for books, video tapes, DVDs and much more.
  • Go to Amazon.co.uk Home Page

Click Here!